term

Truth

진리 (Jilli) · 참 (Cham) · 말씀 (Malsseum, Word) · 원리 (Wolli, Principle) · 진실 (Jinsil)

What Is Truth?

In Unification Theology, Truth (진리, Jilli) is not a proposition to be verified, a doctrine to be defended, or a tradition to be preserved — it is the living expression of God's nature and will, the invisible blueprint according to which the universe was created, and the standard against which every human act, thought, and institution must ultimately be measured.

Truth pre-existed the universe as God's own inner character — His eternal Principle (원리, Wolli) — and became the architectural framework of creation. It is absolute, unchanging, and universal: what is true is true everywhere and for everyone, in every age.

Rev. Sun Myung Moon searched for Truth across all the world's religious and philosophical traditions, penetrated the spirit world, and declared that the source of all Truth is not a book, a doctrine, or an institution, but God Himself:

God is the source of trueness. Trueness is established because God exists. When God departs, so does trueness. Then, rather than trueness, the origin of evil will emerge. Trueness is not something human beings can define in any way they please. Rather, trueness is to govern fallen people.

— Sun Myung Moon (24-315, 09/14/1969) The Source of Trueness

This teaching transforms every aspect of the relationship between God, humanity, and knowledge. Truth is not humanity's creation — it is humanity's calling. The search for truth is the most fundamental human activity, and every religion, every science, every philosophy is a fragment of the one great collective quest to return to the Truth from which humanity fell.

Section I — Etymology and Korean Vocabulary

Korean: 진리 (Jilli, 眞理) — the standard academic and theological term Hanja: 眞理 — literally “true principle/reason/logic”
Components: 眞 (jin, true, genuine, real) + 理 (ri, principle, reason, pattern, order)
Related term 1: 참 (cham) — “true” as a modifier; related to 참사람 (True Person), 참부모 (True Parents), 참사랑 (True Love)
Related term 2: 말씀 (malsseum) — the Word; God's word as living, creative truth; revelation
Related term 3: 원리 (wolli, 原理) — Principle; used specifically for the Divine Principle (원리강론), the organized expression of God's truth
Related term 4: 진실 (jinsil, 眞實) — truthfulness, fidelity, sincerity; the personal and ethical dimension of truth

The Korean compound 眞理 (Jilli) mirrors the classical Chinese term 真理 (zhēnlǐ) and the Japanese 真理 (shinri), which together form the dominant East Asian theological vocabulary for truth as an objective, universal principle.

The character 理 (ri / li) carries a rich heritage in Neo-Confucian thought, where it describes the inherent rational order or pattern present in all phenomena — the structuring principle that makes each thing what it is and gives the cosmos its coherent lawfulness.

In Unification Theology, this heritage is absorbed and deepened: 理 is not an impersonal cosmic order but the personal expression of God's own nature, poured into creation as its foundational structure.

The Korean 참 (cham) — “true, genuine, real” — functions as the qualitative marker that distinguishes what exists in accordance with God's original intention from what exists in deviation from it.

When the Unification tradition speaks of the True Parents, the True Family, or the True Love, it is always this same cham that marks the ontological distinction: not merely better, but belonging to a wholly different category — the original, unfallen, God-centered reality.

Section II — The Dual Structure of Truth: Internal and External

One of the most distinctive contributions of the Exposition of the Divine Principle to the theology and philosophy of truth is its systematic treatment of what it calls the dual structure of truth: the distinction and necessary integration between internal truth and external truth.

Internal truth (내적 진리) is the truth that religion has always sought: the truth about the origin of human beings, the purpose of life, the nature of good and evil, the existence of God, and the destiny of the soul after death.

This is the truth that overcomes internal ignorance — humanity's spiritual blindness about the invisible dimensions of reality. Religion, across all its forms, has been God's providential instrument for illuminating this dimension.

External truth (외적 진리) is the truth that science has pursued: the laws governing the physical universe, the principles of matter and energy, the structure of living organisms, and the history of the cosmos. This is the truth that overcomes external ignorance — humanity's blindness about the visible, material world. Science has been the path of external illumination.

The Exposition of the Divine Principle makes a revolutionary claim: these two paths of truth must ultimately converge. They are not rivals but complementary explorations of the single reality that God created. Religion without science becomes superstition; science without religion becomes nihilism.

The final truth — what Rev. Moon called the new truth — must be able to reconcile these two dimensions in a single, integrated framework that honors both the spiritual and the physical, the inner and the outer:

Spirit and truth are unique, eternal and unchanging. However, the degree and scope of their teaching and the means of their expression will vary from one age to another as they restore humankind from a state of utter ignorance. Religion and science, each in their own spheres, have been the methods of searching for truth in order to conquer ignorance and attain knowledge. Eventually, the way of religion and the way of science should be integrated in one united undertaking.

— Sun Myung Moon The Last Days and the New Truth

This commitment to integration is fundamental to the Unification worldview. God is the author of both the natural laws that science discovers and the spiritual principles that religion teaches. They cannot ultimately contradict each other because they both come from the same source. Any apparent contradiction between them is a sign of incomplete knowledge — either the science is incomplete, the theology is incomplete, or both.

Section III — The Word (말씀): Truth as Pre-Existent Blueprint

The Korean term 말씀 (malsseum, 말씀) — usually translated as “the Word” — captures the most primary level at which Truth operates in Unification Theology: as the divine speech-act by which God both thinks and creates.

Before any created being existed, God existed with His Word. The Word is not merely a linguistic expression but the totality of God's conceptual blueprint for creation — His vision of every being, every law, every relationship, every value that would exist in the world He intended to make. The Word precedes the world as the architect's plan precedes the building.

This concept is in deep resonance with the prologue of the Gospel of John (1:1–5): “In the beginning was the Word (Logos), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God... All things were made through him, and without him was not anything made that was made.” The Unification teaching draws upon this Johannine Logos theology but integrates it with a broader framework drawn from many traditions.

When God said “Let there be light” (Genesis 1:3), this was not a magical incantation — it was the externalization of a pre-existing divine intention, the Word becoming matter.

The laws of physics, the structure of DNA, the moral order governing human relationships — all of these are, in their deepest nature, expressions of the creative Word. Science discovers the Word written in the physical world; religion discovers the Word written in the human heart.

With what was the world created? Originally, there was God's will. There was God's idea. Along with it, there was God's plan. God's original will was to create humans and the human world according to His plan. Therefore, human beings, no matter how fallen, should stand within the Will and plan of God.

— Sun Myung Moon (76-92, 02/01/1975) Eternal Truth

This insistence that even fallen human beings remain within God's plan — that the Fall corrupted but did not erase the original blueprint — is foundational to the Unification theology of hope. Truth is not merely the description of what is but the declaration of what was meant to be and therefore still can be.

The truth about creation is simultaneously the truth about restoration: both describe the same original design, the same divine intention, and therefore the same ultimate destination.

Section IV — Truth as Absolute Standard: The Measure of All Things

Rev. Moon developed one of his most memorable and philosophically rigorous teachings on truth through the image of measurement. What makes something “true”? How do we know truth when we see it? His answer: the same way we know a measurement is accurate — by comparison with an absolute standard.

The metric system provides a useful analogy. One millimeter is one millimeter everywhere on earth: in Seoul, in New York, in Lagos, in Buenos Aires. It does not change depending on culture, historical period, or the personal preferences of the measurer. It is the absolute, universal, unchanging reference point from which all other measurements derive their validity. Rev. Moon asked: Is there such an absolute standard for human life, values, and existence? And he answered: yes — and that standard is Love, which is the ultimate expression of Truth.

A true heart does not change. Without it, a standard cannot be set and things cannot be evaluated by saying, "It is this way" or "It is that way." Units of measure have a standard, and from that standard, something can be gauged as accurate or not. When an issue arises, it can be measured against the standard and, if it fits exactly, all the objections throughout the ages will fall away.

— Sun Myung Moon (186-65, 01/29/1989) The Standard Measure of Truth

From this metrological insight, Rev. Moon drew a remarkable criterion for truth: what is true must be true universally — not only for good people but for bad people, not only for one nation but for all nations, not only in one age but in every age. Anything that is “true” only within one community, culture, or historical period is not fully true — it is at best a partial, relative approximation of Truth.

He illustrated this with the example of Admiral Yi Soon-shin — Korea's great naval hero. Yi is revered in Korea as a patriot and a symbol of courage. But from the Japanese perspective, he was an enemy. Therefore, Yi cannot be described as a perfectly True Person: his “trueness” is relative to a national perspective.

By contrast, something that is genuinely true is recognized and affirmed by all human beings — across cultural, national, linguistic, and historical divides — because it resonates with the original mind, the conscience, that every person possesses.

This universality criterion is not a form of cultural relativism but its exact opposite: it is the affirmation that there is an absolute truth beyond all cultural conditioning, and that this truth is recognizable by the original human conscience wherever and whenever it is honestly consulted.

Section V — Truth, Character, and Heart: Three Pillars of Restoration

In one of his earliest sermons recorded at tplegacy.net, delivered in 1966, Rev. Moon laid out a foundational framework for human completion and the establishment of the Kingdom of Heaven that would structure his teaching for decades: the three pillars of Truth (진리, Jilli), Character (인격, Ingyeok), and Heart (심정, Shimjeong).

Truth is the outer shield — the clear ideological foundation that allows a person to identify good and evil, to stand firm against Satan's false claims, and to navigate the providential history with clarity and direction.

Without truth, a person cannot distinguish what is genuinely good from what merely appears good. Many righteous people throughout history gave their lives seeking this truth; many saints were sacrificed because they pursued it without having it in its complete form.

Character (인격) is the inner armor — the developed moral and spiritual strength that allows a person to confront evil directly, to gain Satan's submission not through force but through embodied goodness and love. Character must be built upon the foundation of truth, but truth without character remains intellectual, unable to transform reality.

Heart (심정) is the ultimate foundation — the dimension that transcends both truth and character and connects the person directly to God's own inner nature.

Heart is the source of true parental love: the capacity to love one's enemies, to suffer for others without resentment, to carry the weight of humanity's fallen history as if it were one's own burden.

The person who has developed heart to its fullest extent stands in the position of parent to the world — the representative of God's own heart toward His lost children.

You must seek and find the truth that is armored with a clear ideology. You must be resolute to walk the path with a shield of the truth. You must develop your character that can confront Satan squarely to his face with the truth that is centered on God's word. After you develop such a character, you need to develop your shimjeong (heart). On the foundation of this heart, finally, a place of Sabbath — of true rest — can be established.

— Sun Myung Moon The Blessed Land Shall Be Established by Truth, Character and Heart

This threefold framework reveals something crucial about the Unification understanding of truth: truth is not self-sufficient. Knowing the truth intellectually is not enough — it must be embodied in character and felt in the heart.

The person who knows the truth but whose character and heart remain undeveloped is like someone who has a map but lacks the legs to walk the journey. Conversely, the person who has heart and character without truth may have sincere love but no reliable direction.

Section VI — The New Truth: Progressive Revelation and the Exposition of the Divine Principle

A distinctive and theologically bold element of the Unification understanding of truth is the doctrine of progressive revelation: the teaching that God has not revealed the fullness of His truth all at once, but has unfolded it gradually across the ages of providential history, in proportion to humanity's capacity to receive and act upon it.

The Exposition of the Divine Principle places this idea at the center of its understanding of history. In the age before written scriptures, God communicated through sacrifice and ritual.

In the Old Testament Age, through the Law and the prophets. In the New Testament Age, through Jesus and the apostles. But Jesus himself declared that he had more to say than his contemporaries could bear (John 16:12) — and that the Spirit of Truth would come to reveal what could not yet be told (John 16:13).

The implication is radical: the Bible, sacred and foundational as it is, is not the final or complete expression of God's truth. It is, in the language of the Exposition of the Divine Principle, a textbook — the best textbook available for its age, but not the ultimate truth itself. Truth is greater than any of its expressions.

As Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life” — meaning that he himself, as a living person, was the embodiment of truth in a way that exceeded any written text.

This teaching leads directly to the Unification claim that the Completed Testament Age brings a new expression of truth: one more complete, more scientifically integrated, and more adequate to the spiritual and intellectual needs of the modern era.

The Exposition of the Divine Principle itself is offered as such a new expression — not as a replacement for the Bible but as its fulfillment, the “codebook” that clarifies the parables and symbols that have long divided believers into competing denominations.

The Unification Principle is not a philosophy, nor a mere theory — it is God's Principle, like the Word itself. It is God's immutable truth. Once this truth has been revealed, one must live according to the Principle and act under the Principle. Truth must be embodied. Truth must persist and reach completion within living human beings. Otherwise, truth can be taken and misused by Satan.

— Sun Myung Moon (091-124, 02/03/1977) The Exposition of the Divine Principle

This passage captures the full Unification understanding of truth in a single arc: truth originates in God, is expressed in the Word, must be received by human beings, must be lived and embodied in a person's actual existence, and only when lived completely — in a human being whose mind and body are fully aligned with God's Principle — is truth truly established.

The ultimate expression of truth is not a book or a system but a fully realized human person living in complete accord with God's original design.

Section VII — Providential Context: Truth in the Three Ages

Across the three ages of God's Providence, truth's role and expression evolve significantly.

The Old Testament Age communicated truth primarily through external conditions: ritual, sacrifice, law, and physical commandments. Truth was present but largely encoded in external forms rather than directly accessible to the inner person. The people knew what was required of them but did not yet understand the why — the inner logic of God's heart and purposes — in the way that Jesus would later reveal it.

The New Testament Age brought truth to the level of the heart and faith: Jesus taught in parables, spoke of the Father's love, and ultimately embodied truth as a living person rather than merely transmitting it as law. “I am the truth” (John 14:6) was the declaration of a new relationship between truth and personhood: truth is not external to the person who embodies it; it is that person's most intimate identity.

The Completed Testament Age brings truth to the level of lineage and family: the complete truth about the original design of human beings as God's children, the complete explanation of the Fall, the complete revelation of the path of restoration, and the complete embodiment of truth in True Parents who have actually lived it out across all eight stages of providential history.

In this age, truth is no longer a promise or a principle — it is a demonstrated reality, available to all who receive the Blessing and commit to living according to God's original design.

Section VIII — Comparative Perspective: Truth in Philosophy and World Traditions

The question of truth — what it is, how we know it, whether it is absolute or relative, and what relationship it has to the divine — is among the oldest and most universal questions in human intellectual and spiritual history.

The Greek Logos Tradition

The Stoic philosophers of ancient Greece developed the concept of the Logos — the divine Reason or Word that pervades and orders the entire cosmos. For the Stoics, the Logos is both the rational principle of the universe and the spark of divine reason present within each human being. To live according to the Logos is to live in accordance with nature, reason, and truth simultaneously.

This resonates profoundly with the Unification understanding of the Divine Principle as the creative Word that structures all of reality: both the physical laws discovered by science and the moral laws articulated by religion are expressions of the same fundamental Logos.

Plato took this further in his theory of Forms: ultimate truth (aletheia, ἀλήθεια — literally “un-hiddenness” or “disclosure”) consists in the eternal, unchanging Forms or Ideas that underlie all changing, material appearances. The physical world is a shadow; the world of Ideas is the real.

The philosopher's task is to ascend from the shadows to the light of truth. This Platonic emphasis on truth as eternal and unchanging maps closely onto the Unification insistence that genuine truth transcends time, place, and culture.

John's Gospel: “I am the Truth”

The Christian revelation brought the Greek Logos concept into intimate personal focus with the identification of the incarnate Christ as the Logos made flesh (John 1:14).

Jesus' declaration “I am the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6) is pivotal in Unification Theology. Rev. Moon consistently observed that this declaration points beyond mere doctrinal statement: Jesus was not saying “I teach the truth” but “I am the truth” — meaning that truth is most fully present not in written texts but in a living person who has completely embodied God's word and will. This points toward the Unification teaching that the ultimate expression of truth is the True Person who has fulfilled the Divine Principle completely.

Islam: Al-Haqq — God as the Ultimate Truth

One of the ninety-nine Names of God in Islamic theology is Al-Haqq (الحق) — the Truth, the Real, the Ultimate Reality. This name appears directly in the Quran (22:62, 24:25) and is central to Islamic philosophical theology. The Sufi mystic Al-Hallaj famously declared “Ana al-Haqq” — “I am the Truth” — a statement that caused his execution but that many later Sufi theologians interpreted as the mystic's self-annihilation in the divine Truth. For Islamic Sufism, God is the only ultimate Reality, and all created things are real only insofar as they participate in God's Being, which is identical with Truth.

Hinduism: Satya (सत्य) — the Foundation of Existence

In Sanskrit, satya (derived from sat, Being) means both “truth” and “existence” — the authentic, the real, the enduring. Mahatma Gandhi's entire political and spiritual philosophy was built upon satyagraha (“truth-force” or “soul-force”), the conviction that truth has an inherent power that ultimately overcomes untruth, just as light overcomes darkness.

The Upanishads declare Satyam Brahman — “Brahman is Truth” — identifying ultimate reality with truth itself. This parallels the Unification affirmation that God is the source of trueness and that without God, trueness cannot exist.

Taoism: The Tao as the Unnameable Truth

In the opening line of the Tao Te Ching, Laozi declares: “The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao.” This paradox — that the ultimate truth cannot be fully captured in words — is not the denial of truth but its most radical affirmation: truth is deeper than any expression of it. The Tao is the underlying principle of reality, the source of all being, the pattern that governs all phenomena. The sage who aligns with the Tao moves in perfect harmony with reality — not because he has mastered a doctrine but because he has ceased to resist the flow of truth.

The Unification principle echoes this in its insistence that the Exposition of the Divine Principle is not the truth itself but a textbook teaching the truth — the map is not the territory, the word is not the Word.

Buddhism: Dharma as Cosmic Truth

The Buddhist Dharma (Pāli: Dhamma) encompasses both the cosmic law governing existence and the specific teaching of the Buddha that reveals this law. When the Buddha attained enlightenment, he grasped the Dharma — the truth of impermanence, interdependence, and the path of liberation.

The Dharma is described as akālika (timeless, not bound to a particular era) and ehipassiko (inviting investigation, verifiable by anyone who looks honestly).

This empirical, universally verifiable character of Dharma parallels the Unification insistence that true truth must be recognizable by all people, in all cultures, in all times — including by bad people and good people alike.

Confucianism: 理 (Li) — Principle as the Structure of Right Relationships

Neo-Confucian philosophy, particularly in the thought of Zhu Xi (朱熹, 1130–1200), built its entire framework around the concept of 理 (li, Principle) — the rational, moral pattern present in all things and relationships.

Each thing has its own 理 that makes it what it is, and human moral cultivation consists in grasping the 理 of the five relationships (ruler-minister, parent-child, husband-wife, elder-younger, friend-friend) and acting in perfect accordance with them. This maps almost exactly onto the Unification framework of the Four Great Realms of Heart: truth in human relationships consists in fully enacting the proper love appropriate to each relational position.

Confucius' observation “Those who follow Heaven will prosper; those who go against Heaven will perish” is cited by Rev. Moon as evidence that even non-biblical wisdom traditions affirm the foundational Unification principle that truth is owned by Heaven.

Kant and the Enlightenment: Truth Through Reason

Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (1781) established the conditions under which knowledge is possible: only within the categories of the human understanding, structured by space, time, and causality.

This analysis has the paradoxical result of showing both the power and the limits of rational knowledge — we can know the phenomenal world with certainty, but the noumenal world (the “thing-in-itself,” including God) lies beyond the reach of theoretical reason. Kant's moral philosophy then attempted to establish an absolute moral truth (the Categorical Imperative) through practical reason alone.

The Unification tradition both affirms and transcends this framework: it affirms that truth is universal and that reason plays an essential role in grasping it, but insists that reason alone cannot reach the deepest truth, which requires revelation — the inner truth that overcomes “internal ignorance” that rational science alone cannot address.

Section IX — Practical Dimension: Living in Truth

For members of the Unification Movement, truth is not primarily an intellectual matter — it is a total orientation of life.

Hoon Dok Hae as Truth Practice

The practice of Hoon Dok Hae (훈독회) — the daily reading of Rev. Moon's words — is the most fundamental daily engagement with truth in Unification practice. Rev. Moon described his words not as his own personal insights but as the expression of God's heart speaking through him.

When members read these words, they are not merely acquiring information; they are attuning themselves to the frequency of God's truth, allowing that truth to penetrate and transform their understanding, their emotions, and their will. Truth received repeatedly, with sincerity and attention, gradually reshapes the fallen nature and restores the original mind.

Living According to Principle

The core practical imperative of truth in Unification life is to align one's daily choices — in family relationships, in economic life, in civic participation — with the Principle.

The Principle is not an abstract doctrine but a concrete framework describing how love flows between God and humanity, how subject-object relationships function in health and in dysfunction, and how restoration occurs through indemnity. To live according to the Principle is to act as a co-creator with God in the work of restoring truth to the world.

Truth as Liberation from Evil

Rev. Moon consistently taught that when a person grasps the truth completely and lives it fully, Satan cannot accuse or accost them. This is the practical liberation that truth brings: “You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free” (John 8:32).

In the Unification understanding, this freedom is not merely psychological or spiritual but cosmic — the person who has become one with God's truth stands in the original position of Adam and Eve before the Fall, outside Satan's sphere of accusation, free to be fully God's child.

That which is true must be true everywhere: in Britain, in Germany, in America, in Korea, in Africa, and also in Japan. Something that is true has no enemies. There is no one that dislikes something true. If something is liked from one side and disliked from the other, it cannot be perfectly true.

— Sun Myung Moon (39-302, 01/16/1971) What Is the Meaning of Trueness?

This universal affirmability of truth is both a theoretical criterion and a practical guide: when in doubt about whether an action or position is truly good, ask whether all people — including those who would prefer evil — would ultimately have to affirm it. That which is genuinely true, genuinely loving, genuinely just, resonates with the original mind of every person and earns universal recognition over time.

Section X — Academic Note

The Unification theology of truth has attracted interest from scholars across multiple disciplines.

Philosophy of religion

The claim that truth is inherently universal and recognizable across all cultures — which underlies Rev. Moon's search for “the truth that is true in Japan as well as Korea” — resonates with what philosophers call moral realism: the position that some moral truths are objective and binding regardless of cultural context.

John Hick's pluralist philosophy of religion similarly sought a universal criterion of religious truth; his “great world religions” are all partial responses to the same ultimate Real.

The Unification position is more specific: the ultimate Real is not an impersonal transcendent reality but a personal God whose nature is love and whose truth is accessible through the restored family.

Epistemology and revelation

The Exposition of the Divine Principle's description of truth as gradually progressive — given in proportion to humanity's capacity to receive it — places Unification Theology within a broad tradition of developmental revelation that includes Lessing's Education of the Human Race, Hegel's philosophy of history, and Hans-Georg Gadamer's hermeneutics of tradition. Frederick Sontag (Sun Myung Moon and the Unification Church, 1977) noted this structural parallel and observed that Rev. Moon's claim to bring a “new truth” fits within an established theological tradition of progressive revelation rather than constituting a mere novelty.

Science-religion dialogue

One of the most significant scholarly engagements with Unification thought has been through the International Conferences on the Unity of the Sciences (ICUS), which Rev. Moon founded in 1972 and which brought together prominent scientists and scholars from across disciplines to address the relationship between scientific and humanistic truth. Scholars, including Alvin Weinberg, Eugene Wigner, and Frederick Seitz, participated, lending serious scientific credibility to the Unification aspiration of integrating scientific and religious knowledge.

This initiative embodies, in institutional form, the core theological conviction that truth is one, that science and religion must ultimately converge, and that their synthesis is both possible and necessary.

Key Texts

Further Reading