True Parents Legacy
term

Communism

공산주의 · 共産主義 · gongsanjuui · also: Marxism-Leninism · Atheistic Materialism · Satan's Ideology

What is Communism in Unification Theology?

Communism (공산주의, gongsanjuui) holds a unique and weighty place in the theology of Rev. Sun Myung Moon — unlike any other political ideology, it is treated not merely as an erroneous socioeconomic system but as the supreme ideological expression of satanic purpose in human history. It is the first system in the entire history of civilization to formally declare that God does not exist, and to build a comprehensive world-historical movement upon that declaration.

Rev. Moon taught that every other wrong idea, false religion, or corrupt social structure in history had at least preserved some connection to the dimension of the spirit — some acknowledgment, however distorted, that there is more to reality than matter.

Communism alone crossed the final line: it looked directly at the living God and declared Him dead, and then mobilized hundreds of millions of human beings and entire nations in service of that declaration.

This is not a political objection. It is a theological one. And it explains why Rev. Moon devoted more than four decades of his life — his personal energy, his resources, his organizations, and at times his physical freedom—to the total defeat of communism.

The greatest event on this earth is the emergence of communism. Why is it the greatest? Because it declares that God, who is plainly alive, does not exist. To claim that what clearly exists does not exist is the greatest of all sins. There is no greater enemy than this. Communism is that enemy. Therefore everything of communism must be dismantled.

— Cheon Seong Gyeong, Sun Myung Moon (022-176, 02/02/1969)

Section I—Etymology and Theological Classification

The Korean term 공산주의 (gongsanjuui, 共産主義) is a Sino-Korean compound: 共 (gong, “together, shared”), 産 (san, “to produce, property”), 主義 (juui, “-ism, doctrine”).

Taken together, it means “the doctrine of shared production/property” — the ideology of collective ownership. This is its socioeconomic face. But Rev. Moon consistently looked past the economic surface to identify communism's theological root.

In the Unification providential framework, communism occupies a precise position in the cosmic history of the relationship between God and Satan. It is not merely a political theory that goes too far in its social analysis; it is the ideological crystallization of Satan's core lie—that God does not exist, that human beings are not God's children, and that the material world is the ultimate and only reality.

Rev. Moon located communism on the Cain side of history—the side of resentment, destruction, and refusal of God—taken to its absolute extreme. While democracy (the Abel-side ideology) retained a connection to God through its religious and ethical foundations, communism went the full distance in the opposite direction: it institutionalized atheism, materialized the human being, and organized an entire civilization around the denial of God's existence and love.

Three theological errors define communism from a Unification perspective:

First, the denial of God

Communism's foundational claim—that there is no God, no spirit, no transcendent dimension of reality—contradicts the most basic truth of existence.

If God exists, then communism is built on a foundational lie, and everything that follows from it must eventually collapse.

Second, the denial of the spirit

Marxist materialism insists that consciousness, culture, religion, and moral values are nothing but reflections of material economic conditions. This denies the reality of the spirit self (yeonginsang), the inner nature of the human being, and the entire dimension of heart and love that constitutes humanity's highest reality.

Third, the denial of the family

Communist ideology systematically attacked the family—the building block of God's creation—through the dissolution of religion, the collectivization of child-rearing, and the elimination of private ownership. By dismantling the God-centered family, it destroyed the very unit through which God's love was meant to flow from generation to generation.

Section II — Communism in the Exposition of the Divine Principle

The Exposition of the Divine Principle addresses communism in the context of its analysis of the Last Days and the period of preparation for the Second Advent of the Messiah.

The Exposition teaches that after the First World War, history bifurcated into two great world-historical camps:

The democratic world — the Abel-side camp, rooted in Christianity, preserving (however imperfectly) belief in God, human dignity, and the value of the family. Its historical role was to serve as the foundation upon which the Lord of the Second Advent could work.

The communist world — the Cain-side camp, organized around atheistic materialism, violence, and the systematic destruction of all institutions connected to God. Its purpose, in the Unification reading, was to play the role of the antithesis that Abel must overcome.

Rev. Moon taught that the Third World War would be an ideological war — not primarily fought with weapons, but with ideas. The decisive battle would be between a God-affirming worldview and the atheistic materialism of communism. This is precisely the war he committed his life to fighting.

The Exposition of the Divine Principle further connects the timing of communism's emergence to the biblical principle of number: Rev. Moon declared decades in advance that communism, having begun with the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, could not survive past its 73rd year — because the number 70 (plus a completion period) represented its providential limit. This prediction was mocked by scholars. The Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, 74 years after its founding.

Section III — Victory Over Communism Theory

Beginning in the early 1960s, Rev. Moon developed, together with Dr. Sang Hun Lee, a comprehensive ideological system specifically designed to defeat communism — not through suppression but through intellectual engagement. This system became known as the Victory Over Communism Theory (승공이론, seunggong iron — literally “theory for overcoming communism”).

Victory Over Communism Theory operates on a simple but profound premise: communism can only be defeated by exposing its foundational philosophical error, not merely by opposing its politics or economics. The political and economic failures of communism are symptoms; the disease is atheism.

The core argument of the Victory Over Communism Theory is:

If God exists, communism is wrong

Communism's entire edifice — its view of human nature, its theory of history, its economic program, its moral claims — rests on the premise that God does not exist. Remove that premise, and the entire structure collapses. Therefore, the decisive ideological task is to demonstrate the existence of God with the same rigor and systematic force that communism marshals for its materialism.

Victory Over Communism Theory examined and refuted each of the three pillars of Marxist-Leninist thought:

Dialectical Materialism — Marx's claim that the ultimate reality is matter in dialectical self-contradiction. Victory Over Communism Theory responded by demonstrating the prior reality of the incorporeal dimension (God, spirit, love) without which matter cannot be understood.

Historical Materialism — the claim that all of history is determined by the economic “base” (mode of production) and that culture, religion, and ideas are merely its “superstructure.” Victory Over Communism Theory demonstrated that ideas and spiritual reality have genuine causal power in history, as demonstrated most dramatically by the fact that communism itself began as an idea.

The Theory of Class Struggle — the claim that history is driven by the conflict between exploiters and exploited, and that this conflict must inevitably culminate in violent revolution. Victory Over Communism Theory offered an alternative theory of social development rooted in cooperation, service, and living for others, which could resolve social inequity without violence.

Today the world is divided into the democratic world and the communist world. The democratic world is being pushed by the communist world because democracy has no thought that surpasses communism. Therefore we must establish a thought and ideology that can surpass communism. That is Cheonjuism — Godism. From 1962 we prepared, and in 1965 we began. The organization that can defeat communism is the Victory Over Communism movement.

— Cheon Seong Gyeong, Sun Myung Moon (019-081, 12/29/1967)

The first English translation of the Victory Over Communism Theory was published in 1972. Its 1985 adaptation — the CAUSA Lecture Manual — was translated into eleven languages. Spain's historian and former Minister of Culture, Ricardo de la Cierva, described the CAUSA manual as offering “the best analysis of Marxism-Leninism in print.”

Section IV — Godism and the Headwing Philosophy as an Alternative

Victory Over Communism Theory was not only a critique — it came with a positive alternative. Rev. Moon insisted that merely being “anti-communist” was insufficient. “I do not like the word 'anti-communist,'” he said. “Anti-communism does not produce victory. You must go further — you must overcome communism.” (022-176, 1969)

The positive alternative had two dimensions: Godism (하나님주의, Hananim juui) and Headwing Thought (두익사상, duik sasang).

Godism (하나님주의) is the affirmation that God is the supreme reality, the Parent of all humanity, and the standard by which all ideologies are to be judged. It holds that every human being is a child of God regardless of race, nationality, or class, and that a world order rooted in this truth — rather than in class conflict or materialist determinism — is both possible and necessary.

Godism does not simply reassert traditional religion against communism. It offers a comprehensive philosophy encompassing the nature of God, the structure of existence, the meaning of human history, and the foundations of politics and economics — one that can engage the intellectual claims of Marxism on equal ground and surpass them.

Headwing Thought (두익사상) is the political and social expression of Godism. Rev. Moon coined this term in 1986-1987 as he saw the communist world entering its final crisis phase. He taught that both left-wing and right-wing ideologies were partial and therefore both ultimately destructive: the left absolutized the collective and destroyed the individual; the right absolutized the individual and abandoned responsibility to the whole.

The Headwing — positioned above both left and right, as the head governs both arms — integrates what is valid in each while being grounded in neither. It is centered on God, rooted in the ideal family, and oriented toward a world of interdependence, mutual prosperity, and universally shared values.

What we should uphold is the Headwing, not the left wing or the right wing. The Headwing exists under God. Humanists whose life is based on materialism need the concept of Headwing — they cannot object to that. Religious people require Godism — with it, they cannot dispute. These two words, "Godism" and "Headwing," are persuasive to two different types of people: religious people and secular people.

— Headwing Philosophy, Sun Myung Moon

Section V — What Rev. Moon Did: A History of Anti-Communist Action

Rev. Moon's opposition to communism was not abstract or theoretical. He built one of the most extensive anti-communist networks in the non-governmental world, operating across multiple continents and decades. The following is a structured account of his major activities.

Personal experience of communism (1946-1950)

Before any organization was built, Rev. Moon lived communism's reality firsthand. After Korea's liberation from Japan in 1945, he traveled to Pyongyang — then the center of Korean Christianity and, increasingly, of Soviet-backed communist power — to begin his public mission. He was arrested by the North Korean authorities in 1946, tortured, and imprisoned.

Released, he continued his work. He was arrested again and sentenced to the Hungnam labor camp in 1948 — a brutal forced-labor prison where forty percent of inmates died annually. He was liberated by United Nations forces during the Korean War in 1950. This personal passage through communist oppression shaped his understanding of communism not as an abstract ideology but as a living force of evil that must be confronted with the whole of one's being.

The Victory Over Communism organization in Korea

In 1962, Rev. Moon began developing the intellectual foundations of the Victory Over Communism Theory.

In 1963, he founded what would become the International Federation for Victory over Communism (국제승공연합, IFVOC). By the early 1970s, hundreds of thousands of Korean civil servants, military officers, and local officials were being trained annually in the Victory Over Communism theory, with government cooperation. IFVOC membership reached over 4 million in Korea and 7 million in Japan.

The Yoido Island rally (1975)

On June 7, 1975, Rev. Moon organized and addressed an anti-communist rally on Yoido Island in Seoul that drew over one million people — one of the largest political rallies in Korean history. It was a public declaration that the ideological battle against communism was a national, spiritual, and providential necessity.

The CAUSA movement in Latin America (1980s)

In 1980, Rev. Moon founded CAUSA International — an anti-communist educational organization that operated in 21 countries across Latin America, Europe, and the United States. CAUSA trained military leaders, government officials, academics, and religious leaders in the principles of Godism and Victory Over Communism Theory.

In Latin America, where communist guerrilla movements posed immediate threats to stable governance, CAUSA's educational work was particularly intensive. Rev. Moon created the American Leadership Conference (AULA) to coordinate retired American generals and military advisors working to support anti-communist governance in Latin American nations.

The Washington Times (founded 1982)

Rev. Moon founded The Washington Times newspaper explicitly as an instrument to counter communism and its influence in American media and politics. He wrote:

“The Washington Times will be the instrument in spreading the truth about God to the world.”

The paper's founding mission, as he described it, was to provide a God-affirming, patriotic voice in America's capital city at the precise moment when communist influence was most dangerous. The Washington Times became one of the most influential conservative newspapers in the United States.

Danbury and the Fall of the Soviet Empire (1985)

In 1984-1985, Rev. Moon was imprisoned in Danbury Federal Prison in the United States on a tax conviction he maintained was politically motivated. While imprisoned, he instructed Dr. Morton Kaplan, chairman of a major Professors World Peace Academy conference in Geneva, to declare the imminent fall of the Soviet Empire. Kaplan, a distinguished political scientist, objected that such a declaration would destroy his academic credibility.

Rev. Moon told him, “Go and declare it. Watch — within five years the communist world will collapse.” The declaration was made.

The Berlin Wall fell in 1989. The Soviet Union dissolved in 1991. As Rev. Moon said afterward: “I declared that communism would not survive 73 years, and I declared this 40 years earlier. It was not my prediction — it was the law of Heaven.” (245-031, 02/28/1993)

The Moscow Conference (April 1990)

Rev. Moon organized the Moscow World Media Conference in April 1990 — the first major international conference of its kind ever held in the Soviet capital — bringing together over 600 participants from 60 nations, including more than 40 former and current heads of state. This was a historic breakthrough; only years before, the KGB had designated Rev. Moon as its number-one ideological enemy. In Moscow, rather than praising glasnost or perestroika, he delivered his characteristic message: “If the Soviet people do not come to know God, the Soviet Union will perish.” (201-231, 04/22/1990)

Meeting with Mikhail Gorbachev (April 11, 1990)

Rev. Moon met with Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev in the Kremlin — a meeting that symbolized the pivot of an entire era. He did not come as a political ally or a business partner; he came as a man who had fought Soviet communism for his entire adult life and who now offered, in the spirit of God's love, reconciliation and a path forward. The encounter was described by journalist Georgie Anne Geyer as among “the most impossible events in the Soviet Union” — Moscow News had previously called Rev. Moon “the most brilliant anti-communist and the No. 1 enemy of the state.” Now it declared: “It is time to reconcile.”

Meeting with Kim Il Sung (December 1991)

Only months after the Soviet Union began its formal dissolution, Rev. Moon traveled to North Korea to meet with Kim Il Sung — the man whose government had arrested and tortured him 45 years earlier. Rather than presenting demands or political positions, Rev. Moon proposed: “Unification cannot be achieved through the Juche ideology.

Let us unite through Godism, through which North and South Korea can live together.” He also proposed establishing an industrial complex in North Korea — the Pyeonghwa Motors factory — as a concrete expression of the principle that enemies can become brothers through service and love.

Underground operations

Rev. Moon acknowledged that for decades, the Unification Church had maintained covert networks inside the Soviet Union and China — operations unknown even to the KGB and Chinese intelligence.

“The Unification Church has been conducting underground operations in China and the Soviet Union for decades. Not even the KGB or China's intelligence agencies knew. After the fall, they asked: 'Did Rev. Moon have an underground organization in Russia?'” (255-107, 03/10/1994)

Section VI — The Providential Significance of the Cold War

From the Unification theological perspective, the Cold War between democracy and communism was not simply a geopolitical conflict — it was the final cosmic battle between God and Satan played out on the stage of world history.

Rev. Moon taught that Korea — specifically the 38th parallel that divides North and South Korea — was the single place on earth where God and Satan directly confronted each other. The demilitarized zone at Panmunjom was not merely a military boundary; it was the spiritual frontline of human history, the place where the fate of the entire providential dispensation was most directly at stake.

This is why the Korean War (1950-1953) was providentially significant. The United Nations intervention — led by sixteen nations on the side of South Korea — represented, in the Unification reading, the first time in history that the international community stood together in defense of God's side against Satan's advance. Had South Korea fallen to communist control, the environment in which Rev. Moon was to begin his public mission would have been eliminated.

The Korean peninsula is the final front line of the democratic world and the communist world. Panmunjom — the only negotiating table of its kind in the world — is like the gate where God and Satan confront each other. Therefore, the era has come when Korea can take world leadership. We must have a thought that surpasses communism, push through the ceasefire line, and run toward a new world.

— Cheon Seong Gyeong, Sun Myung Moon (023-179, 05/18/1969)

Section VII — The Philosophical Analysis: Why Communism Failed

Unification Thought offers a detailed philosophical account of why communism was destined to fail — not merely politically but ontologically.

The First Error: Atheism

Communism denied God. But God, in Unification theology, is the source of all existence — the Universal Prime Energy, the origin of the give and take action that sustains all creation, the Parent whose love is the foundation of all value. A civilization built on the denial of this reality cannot sustain itself indefinitely because it is built on falsehood.

The Second Error: The denial of the spirit

Human beings are dual beings — physical body and spirit self. Communism's reduction of the human being to purely material status denied the spirit and therefore denied the dimension in which the most fundamental human needs — for love, beauty, meaning, and transcendence — are rooted. This produced a civilization of profound spiritual emptiness that no amount of material provision could fill.

The Third Error: Class struggle as the engine of history

The claim that history is driven by class antagonism, and that this antagonism can only be resolved through violent revolution, contradicts the Principle of Creation's vision of history as the progressive restoration of loving relationships. It institutionalized resentment, envy, and destruction as the motors of human progress.

The Fourth Error: Collectivism against the family

By subordinating the individual and the family to the collective state, communism violated the basic structure of the Four Position Foundation — the unit of God, individual, spouse, and children through which God's love flows into the world.

Without the God-centered family as the basic unit of society, no civilization can remain whole.

The Fifth Error: Living for oneself

Rev. Moon identified the deepest root of communism's failure as the same root that underlies all of fallen human civilization: the principle of living for oneself rather than for others. A society structured around collective self-interest, however dressed in the language of egalitarianism, remains fundamentally self-centered and therefore disconnected from the creative power of God's love.

Section VIII — The Unification Thought Philosophical Refutation of Marxism

The existing article covers why communism failed from a theological and providential perspective. What follows is the systematic philosophical dimension of that refutation, drawn from Unification Thought — the comprehensive philosophical system developed by Dr. Sang Hun Lee under the direction of Rev. Moon — as presented on uthought.org.

Unification Thought engages Marxism not as a political adversary but as a philosophical system — and defeats it on philosophical ground, discipline by discipline: ontology, epistemology, theory of history, logic, and axiology.

The Ontological Error: Matter Without a Source

The foundation of Marxist philosophy is dialectical materialism — the claim that matter is the ultimate reality and that it develops through the self-contradiction of opposites. This claim was examined and rejected by Unification Thought at the level of ontology — the theory of being itself.

The central question of ontology is: What is the origin of the universe? Marx, following Ludwig Feuerbach's inversion of Hegel, answered: matter is self-subsistent and primary; consciousness is secondary and derived from it.

Unification Thought responds at two levels.

First, the material world cannot be self-explanatory. Every observable phenomenon — motion, structure, growth, relationship — presupposes a principle governing it. Unification Thought identifies this principle as the Theory of the Original Image, which demonstrates that all existence reflects the dual structure of God: the interaction of Sungsang (inner, incorporeal dimension — spirit, mind, purpose) and Hyungsang (outer, physical dimension — matter, form). Matter does not generate mind; rather, mind and matter are correlative expressions of a single divine source.

Second, Marx's philosophical genealogy itself undermines his claim. Hegel had already demonstrated that the self-development of pure spirit (Logos/Idea) is the motor of existence. Marx inverted Hegel, making matter the primary substance while retaining the dialectical structure of thesis–antithesis–synthesis.

Unification Thought shows that this inversion is incoherent: if consciousness is merely a reflection of material conditions, then Marx's own theory of revolution — itself an idea — has no power to change material conditions. The revolutionary theory is self-defeating.

As Unification Thought summarizes, Marx's failure arose from two specific errors — unconditionally denying God without knowing the true God, and advocating social reform through violence, in defiance of the principle that violence necessarily produces further violence.

What is the origin of the universe? It is not matter. The origin is the invisible God — the God who has both an inner character and an outer form, both a masculine nature and a feminine nature — from whom all visible things came into being. Communism denies this, and therefore it is built on a lie from its very first word.

Key reference: Marx's Materialism — Traditional Ontologies and Unification Thought

— Cheon Seong Gyeong, Sun Myung Moon

The Epistemological Error: Consciousness as Mere Reflection

Marx and Lenin developed a specific theory of knowledge: the Theory of Reflection (Widerspiegelungstheorie).

According to this view, consciousness is a passive mirror of the material world — a biological function of the brain that simply copies objective reality. Knowledge is thus a product of material conditions, and the ultimate criterion of truth is revolutionary practice.

Unification Thought examines and dismantles this theory in detail in its Critique of Marxist Epistemology.

The first problem is internal to the theory itself. If consciousness merely reflects the external world passively, there is no explanation for how it can perform rational cognition — abstraction, logical inference, judgment — or how it can direct purposive revolutionary practice. Between passive reflection on one hand and active logical thought and goal-oriented action on the other, there is a logical abyss that the materialist framework cannot bridge.

The second problem concerns the standard of truth. Lenin affirmed the existence of absolute truth, defining it as the sum-total of infinitely accumulated relative truths. Unification Thought demonstrates that this is self-contradictory: no accumulation of relative truths can produce an absolute truth, because the sum of the relative remains relative.

Absolute truth requires an absolute standard — and an absolute standard requires an Absolute Being as its source. Without God, the very concept of “absolute truth” becomes meaningless.

The third problem concerns cognition itself. Unification Thought's epistemology demonstrates that genuine cognition is not a passive process but a correlative give-and-receive action between the knowing subject and the known object. The subject brings to the act of knowing a previously existing prototype — an inner structure that corresponds to the structure of external things — because human beings were created as the image of God, and all things were created as objects of joy for human beings.

This structural resonance makes genuine knowledge possible. Marxist materialism, which denies both God and this structured interiority of the human being, has no adequate account of why cognition is possible at all.

Key reference: A Critique of Marxist Epistemology

The Historical Error: Class Struggle as the Engine of History

Marx's Historical Materialism — the claim that all of history is determined by the material forces of production and that history's driving engine is class struggle — is the core of his political program. It is also the dimension of Marxism that most directly shaped the twentieth century.

Unification Thought's Theory of History shows why Historical Materialism is fundamentally false on multiple grounds.

First, the claim is empirically falsified. Unification Thought observes that there is not a single historical case in which a society was genuinely transformed by a class struggle following the Marxist model. The Bolshevik Revolution itself was not a spontaneous uprising of the proletariat against the bourgeoisie according to any recognizable Marxist formula — it was a minority coup led by intellectuals. The laws of history that Marx claimed to have discovered proved to be dogma, not science.

Second, the claim is philosophically incoherent. Historical materialism asserts that the development of productive forces is material, but offers no materialistic-dialectical account of how productive forces develop in the first place. The theory asserts necessary progress but cannot explain the mechanism of development within its own framework.

Third, and most fundamentally, Historical Materialism reduces the whole of human history — all its striving, sacrifice, love, creativity, and aspiration — to the rearrangement of material economic conditions. This is not a scientific discovery; it is a metaphysical claim, and a false one.

Unification Thought's view of history shows that history has a spiritual origin, a spiritual direction, and a spiritual goal: it is the history of God's Providence of Restoration — the effort of a Heavenly Parent to recover lost children through love, not the history of an economic mechanism rolling toward a classless utopia.

Key reference: Historical Materialism — Traditional Views of History

The Logical Error: Contradiction as the Law of Development

The logical spine of Marxism is dialectical logic — the claim inherited from Hegel and materialized by Marx and Engels, that reality develops through the self-contradiction of opposites: thesis is negated by antithesis, and their conflict produces synthesis at a higher level. Class struggle is the social expression of this universal law of contradiction.

Unification Thought offers a counter-logic rooted in the structure of creation itself: Origin-Division-Union action (jeong-bun-hap). In this view, what appears to be the conflict of opposites is actually the interaction of complementary elements — male and female, Seongsang and Hyeongsang, subject and object — which, far from being self-contradictions, are structured to engage in give-and-receive action centered on a unifying purpose. Development is not driven by contradiction but by the harmonious cooperation of complementary pairs under a purposive center.

This is not a minor logical adjustment. It is a root-level refutation. If the law of contradiction is not a universal law of being — if being is fundamentally structured for give-and-receive, not for struggle — then the entire theoretical framework of Marxism collapses. Class struggle is not a metaphysical necessity; it is a consequence of the Fall, of the violation of the principle of living for others.

Key reference: Critique of Dialectical Logic — An Appraisal of Traditional Systems of Logic

The Aesthetic Error: Art as a Tool of Revolution

Communism extended its materialism into the domain of art through Socialist Realism — the doctrine, formalized in the Soviet Union under Stalin, that all art must serve the goals of the communist revolution and must realistically depict the world from the standpoint of the “progressive development of revolutionary struggle.”

Unification Thought's Theory of Art offers a systematic critique of this doctrine.

The fundamental error of Socialist Realism is the reduction of art — which is rooted in the shimjeong (heart) of God and in humanity's original desire for beauty and joy — to a tool of ideological utility. When art is subordinated to political purpose, it loses the very quality that makes it art: the free expression of the human spirit's response to beauty and truth.

Notable writers who lived under communist regimes — among them Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Boris Pasternak, and Milan Kundera — gave their own testimony to this truth through their works and their lives. Their artistic witness, in Unification Thought's reading, is itself a providential sign: the human spirit's irreducible yearning for truth, beauty, and transcendence cannot be extinguished by any ideological program.

Key reference: A Critique and Counterproposal to Socialist Realism

The Root of All Five Errors

Unification Thought's survey of the history of philosophy from its Theory of the Original Image through its treatment of ontology, epistemology, logic, history, and aesthetics arrives at a single diagnosis: every error of Marxism flows from a single source — the denial of God.

Ontology without God produces materialism. Epistemology without God produces the theory of reflection and relativism. History without God produces the class-struggle theory. Logic without God produces dialectical contradiction as the law of being. Aesthetics without God produces art as propaganda.

This is why Rev. Moon insisted that communism could not be overcome by political opposition or economic competition alone. It had to be overcome philosophically — by demonstrating, at every level of thought, that God is real, and that the world built on that reality is both truer and better than the world built on its denial.

Section IX — The Principle of Love: Overcoming Communism without Hatred

One of the most distinctive and important dimensions of Rev. Moon's anti-communist work was his insistence that communism must be overcome not through hatred or military force but through love, truth, and service.

He consistently distinguished between communism as an ideology (which must be defeated) and communists as human beings (who are God's children and must be loved). “We must save the people of the communist world through love, and overcome communism with truth.” (052-073, 12/22/1971)

This was not a soft position. It was theologically grounded. If the Fall had been caused by the archangel seducing Eve through counterfeit love, then restoration required the restoration of genuine love — including love extended even to enemies.

"The archangel corrupted Eve through words; therefore, we must restore the archangel through words."

The “words” in this case were the truth of God — presented not with anger but with the persuasive power of genuine love and intellectual rigor.

This is why Rev. Moon's visits to Moscow and Pyongyang were not triumphalist gestures of a victor over a defeated enemy. They were acts of a father going to find lost children. His proposal to Kim Il Sung — “Let us build the North Korean economy through Godism” — was not a political maneuver; it was an expression of the conviction that even the most hardened enemies can be transformed by genuine love and truth.

I proposed to the supreme leader of North Korea: "Unification cannot be achieved through the Juche ideology. Let us unite through Godism, through which North and South Korea can live together." A year before that, I had already declared the Will of God at the risk of my life when I visited the Soviet Union and met with Mikhail Gorbachev. I considered that my life was secondary to upholding and following the Will of God.

— Education Based on Godism, Sun Myung Moon (04/14/2002)

Section X — Academic Note

In New Religious Movements and political science scholarship, Rev. Moon's anti-communist work has been evaluated from multiple angles.

Eileen Barker (The Making of a Moonie, 1984) and subsequent scholars have noted the ideological coherence of the Unification movement's anti-communism — rooted not in political opportunism but in a comprehensive theological framework.

Unlike many Cold War anti-communist movements that had primarily strategic or economic motivations, Unification anti-communism was driven by a spiritual conviction that could not be separated from the movement's core theology.

Thomas Ward and Frederick Swarts in Rush to History: Sun Myung Moon and the End of Soviet Communism argued that historians assessing the fall of communism must reckon with Rev. Moon's role — his CAUSA educational network, his underground operations, his media platform, and his symbolic breakthrough meetings with Gorbachev and Kim Il Sung. They contend that “no single person did more than Reverend Moon to bring about the peaceful end of communism.”

Gordon Melton noted that the Unification movement's anti-communist work represents a unique case in modern religious history: a new religious movement that deployed sophisticated political, media, educational, and diplomatic tools in service of a theological conviction — rather than simply endorsing political parties or lobbying for sectarian interests.

Critics have raised two principal objections.

First, some scholars questioned whether the Unification movement's anti-communist activities served theological goals or primarily served to advance its political influence and protect its economic interests in South Korea and Japan.

Second, the movement's alignment with authoritarian anti-communist governments in South Korea and Latin America during the 1970s and 1980s has been criticized as inconsistent with its stated commitment to human dignity.

Unification scholars respond that these entanglements reflect the practical necessity of working within imperfect political realities in defense of a greater good, and that the movement's ultimate orientation — demonstrated by Rev. Moon's willingness to reach out to communist leaders even at personal risk — always remained grounded in the goal of reconciliation and transformation rather than in the perpetuation of political power.

Key Texts on tplegacy.net

Unification Thought — Philosophical Analysis

More terms
The Last Days Prayer The Second Advent Filial Piety Faith Portion of Responsibility Truth God's Love Messiah The Fall